JohnnyDee
Tour Winner
Who'd have thought that?
Well done everybody.
Well done everybody.
Last edited:
Glad they won. Sky sports is awesome.
Yes the coverage is generally excellent but the fees are really starting to extract the urine now. I'm not prepared to pay the money anymore to finance the wages of some Premiership footballer wanting £300k a week!
Yes the coverage was very good, and my cards on table, I was very anti them getting The Open and still hated the adverts. But I agree they did a bang-up job within the framework of their business model.
However I really agree that the subscription is getting ridiculous and I'm also thinking of jacking it in and getting a Now TV pass just for the big golf events.
The stupid amount of money Sky bid for football should not be used as a stick to beat those of us who are sports fans, but who aren't particularly interested in the beautiful game.
I am sure I detected a quiet wave of laughter around the hall when the chap said their mission is to make golf exciting and accessible.
Yes, you did. I did too.
Sadly it would seem hat our beloved game still has the wider perception among the masses that it's played by geriatric, colourblind silly old fogeys - despite poster boys like Rory, Ricky & Jason etc. :mmm:
Just a thought following on from comments above.
So many of my mates at our club are moaning about Sky's subs and many of them are ex-footballers who love the game, but even they say there is far too much televised football available.
Given Sky made a ludicrously high bid for Premiership rights etc. and then jacked up its complete subs model to claw back the money off those completely uninterested in football (i.e. people taking Entertainment, Movies and non-football sports packages) has the time now not come for them to split their Sports package in two - All sports including Football and other sports?
I know we can get into another Sky v BBC battle here...
The model would not work. If you could cherry pick people would drop most channels. They need to bundle together, even though it annoys me as I don't watch 90% of what is on Sky.
Just a thought following on from comments above.
So many of my mates at our club are moaning about Sky's subs and many of them are ex-footballers who love the game, but even they say there is far too much televised football available.
Given Sky made a ludicrously high bid for Premiership rights etc. and then jacked up its complete subs model to claw back the money off those completely uninterested in football (i.e. people taking Entertainment, Movies and non-football sports packages) has the time now not come for them to split their Sports package in two - All sports including Football and other sports?
Do you think Peter Allis and dear old Ken would change that attitude? I know we can get into another Sky v BBC battle here but at least Sky use modern graphics, pro-tracer, slow mo etc that brings the game into the present and interests the YouTube generation. BBC would not be doing that, they have never innovated, remember watching test cricket as a kid from one end only!! I enjoy golf on the BBC but they did not move with the times, the money was not put in. Sky support golf in an amazing way and should be applauded for that. I don't enjoy paying money to them, we have the regular 6 monthly phone call to reduce the price, but that is what is required to buy all of the rights across the spectrum.
https://www.pgatourlive.com/subscription
OK seems it's only for Thursday & Friday every week and before the main national 'host broadcaster' kicks in but at those prices if they did a deal with someone I'm sure they could bring in all 4 days at an attractive rate for golf fans.
The last paragraph is rubbish, Ken Brown rolling balls on greens, I take it that's not a gimmick?The main problem whilst all those graphics are lovely - it's still only being watched by people but who subscribe to Sky so the it doesn't matter what fancy ball tracking etc etc they have -when it's only being watched by golf fans it's not exactly helping grow the game - you tube generation etc won't be able to watch it unless they have Sky - and they won't pay for Sky unless they like the sport - catch 22.
The viewing figures dropped by 75% from 2015 - from 5 mil to 1 mil , the BBC highlights show had more than Sky live figures
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/sport/2016/jul/18/open-sky-sports-bbc-troon
So for the extra £5mil what golf got was - less people watching but more gimmicks in the coverage
For me I don't care about the graphics and stuff because when they are showing all that and the Sky cart etc etc they are missing showing the actual golf going on out there - with the sport it's wall to wall shots - just show the golf and use all those gimmicks in a highlights show.
Only have to look at the difference in people who watched on Sky or BBC when the Masters were on - whilst the Sky were going through the Sky cart or showing some graphic the BBC were just showing the golf as it should be - pure and simple.