pinberry
Club Champion
Sam, still confused by this ......surely if you put down a spirit level on your intended line, then moved it forward a few feet you will get a different reading and what about pace - wouldn't a slope closer to the hole have a greater impact than one a few feet in front of your? Earlier someone suggested multiple "readings" but I don't see people doing that much.
The talk about measuring like this intrigues me, but am struggling to understand how it can be converted into an almost mechanically sounding exercise despite the multiple variables involved.
Steve, the objective or Aimpoint (or any putt reading technique) is not to get a 100% accurate reading. This is impossible - unless you have a tour level green map. The objective here is to get a good enough reading by feeling the slope with your feet - or by using your eyes or whatever.
Yes, slopes are different all the time, but does that matter? Not much. If a slope changes from 2.2% to 1.9% and then back to 2.5% in the space of 5 feet, the impacts are negligible. Assuming it's a 2% it's good enough and will get the ball into the hole. You might even read it as a 3% slope and still get it into the hole. You get the idea.
Moreover, on longer putts, then getting the read spot on becomes a futile exercise. I mean, there are so many variables. A spike mark here, a pitch mark there, too much speed, face 0.5 degrees open.
As you can see, the AimPoint method is all about getting a good enough approximation that maximizes the chances of reading the putt correctly. Instead of using your eyes you use your feet. And by the way, contrary to popular belief, it might actually result in faster play. Instead of looking at the line from behind, sideways etc you just get one / two reads which take very little and you're ready to putt.