sportsbob
Assistant Pro
What is the ruling regarding a plugged ball when it is not on the cut grass? My understanding that if it is plugged in the rough, in fact anywhere than in a hazard, you can remove it and drop without penalty?
What is the ruling regarding a plugged ball when it is not on the cut grass? My understanding that if it is plugged in the rough, in fact anywhere than in a hazard, you can remove it and drop without penalty?
So unless there is a local rule in place, you either drop with one shot penalty as an unplayable lie, or try and hack your ball out of the plugged lie in the rough (and then apologise to the green staff later)?
Perhaps you should speak to your committee. Most parkland clubs introduce it for the winter season or after prolonged rain.The pros don't get this in tournaments because when the course is that wet these areas are normally marked GUR or get declared abnormal conditions
Pros play plugged ball through the green as local rule in all tournaments apart from Open and US Open I think......
We have a LR as part of our Winter rules to allow you to clean and drop if plugged in rough
Perhaps you should speak to your committee. Most parkland clubs introduce it for the winter season or after prolonged rain.
We have it throughout winter, when the comps start in April we have preffered lies for a bit but not generally through the greens unless it is really wet, we have 2 holes on our course where even in height of summer after a burst of real heavy rain we can get really soft patches as they are low lying and close to water hazards. It doesn't happen often but it does happen. Frustrating I suppose.
Although the specimen local rule doesn't say so, I know the R&A would not object to a local rule specifying defined areas on named holes in a permanent LR. It would certainly be better than declaring them GUR.
all of which suggests that there must be another reason for not widening 25-2 to TTG - or the Rules need changing.
there aren't many situations where I feel the rules are 'wrong'; but this is one.
to argue that a local rule should be in place if conditions are such that a player may find his ball embedded is 100% consistent with providing relief TTG under 25-2!
put another way, finding a ball embedded proves that the LR should be in place etc
all of which suggests that there must be another reason for not widening 25-2 to TTG - or the Rules need changing.
Duncan
It is simply not considered to be a permanent problem on most courses. Similar to stones in bunkers.