Crazyface
Tour Winner
Utter rubbish. The problem has never been solved despite constant tinkering. For me, it is the biggest problem in football and must be addressed to allow more freedom to the attacking team. :thup:
Utter rubbish. The problem has never been solved despite constant tinkering. For me, it is the biggest problem in football and must be addressed to allow more freedom to the attacking team. :thup:
Utter rubbish. The problem has never been solved despite constant tinkering. For me, it is the biggest problem in football and must be addressed to allow more freedom to the attacking team. :thup:
This was trialled at Old Trafford between 1995-2012, but only for the home team.:thup:
I'd bin it. Football gets played in 30yds of the pitch apart from goal kicks.
To be honest, I'd like to see a version with anything goes.
This was trialled at Old Trafford between 1995-2012, but only for the home team.:thup:
Without offside it would be played in two 30yds strips (at each end) with not much in between.......imagine basketball on a 100 yard long court.
I'll go back to when hockey trialled it. At first some teams tried to ping it the length of the pitch, leave players high up but actually it was very easy to defend against and teams soon realised that it was not effective to play the long ball game. Play started to return to normal but without offside controversies and yes there were more goals. As a defender you have to be aware of empty space as much as an attacker but you soon adjust. In football it would probably mean the keeper may have to be a little more pro-active, sweeper style, but many have done that over the years anyway. People in football obsess it would be a return to Wimbledon style teams but I don't think it would happen long term. Only one way to find out.....
It stops the flow of too many attacks, stifles excitement. Does an attackers big toe being behind a defender when the ball is passed forwards really impact on a match? Reducing offsides would bring about more goals without making the game a lottery.
Offside should off side. This inactive player nonsense is daft.
Clough had it right.....
Indeed!
It stops the flow of too many attacks, stifles excitement. Does an attackers big toe being behind a defender when the ball is passed forwards really impact on a match? Reducing offsides would bring about more goals without making the game a lottery.