D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
Very much a man of two lives, how do you view this controversial character?
absolutely thisI think the way he turned his life around and embraced the peace process, especially with Paisley, towards the end of his political career was admirable and I am thankful that eventually he helped to bring Northern Ireland to the most stable and united position it has been in my life time.
Do I forgive his actions as part of the IRA? No, I certainly do not. Do I understand them? Yes I do.
I've seen him compared to Nelson Mandela and that is a fair comparison for me - both were involved in the killing of innocents that they felt were justified when battling the suppression or even subjugation of their culture and kin. I don't think everyone fully understands what it was like as a working class Catholic who felt they were Irish in the middle of the 20th century as it's part of the story that rarely gets told.
I think the way he turned his life around and embraced the peace process, especially with Paisley, towards the end of his political career was admirable and I am thankful that eventually he helped to bring Northern Ireland to the most stable and united position it has been in my life time.
Do I forgive his actions as part of the IRA? No, I certainly do not. Do I understand them? Yes I do.
I've seen him compared to Nelson Mandela and that is a fair comparison for me - both were involved in the killing of innocents that they felt were justified when battling the suppression or even subjugation of their culture and kin. I don't think everyone fully understands what it was like as a working class Catholic who felt they were Irish in the middle of the 20th century as it's part of the story that rarely gets told.
I accept that he attempted to do good in later years but I'm afraid I can't move past his past.
This is my issue, he never once confessed or faced justice for the crimes he committed and I'm with Lord Tebbit, it's wrong to compare him to Mandella, Mandella lived in a country were blacks had no vote and no say, McGuiness chose bullets over democracy.I accept that he attempted to do good in later years but I'm afraid I can't move past his past.
I get that, still different situation to SA, and there are still Catholic families who don't know where the bodies of there loved ones are, "The disappeared" it's not just the Unionists who suffered on his watch.Democracy wasn't helping Catholics in Northern Ireland. Even the formation of NI was completely wrong in their eyes.
But we MUST learn from it.
An angry, violent and at times murderous NI existed before MMcG came on the scene.
He was at the heart of it.
So it was ok to murder children (Warrington, Wildenrath) rather than using democracy?Or from another point of view, he was sick of seeing a massive proportion of Northern Irish people being treated like dirt by the government...
So it was ok to murder children (Warrington, Wildenrath) rather than using democracy?