Keegan Bradley

Stub

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
561
Visit site
Why was Keegan Bradley not in the BMW? The commentator said he had withdrawn because he got a ruling he did not like. Anyone know any more?
 
Did he pull out in time for someone else to get a place tho does anyone know , weekend money could be vital in a not so well name keeping or losing his card
 
Did he pull out in time for someone else to get a place tho does anyone know , weekend money could be vital in a not so well name keeping or losing his card

Not at this event as only the top 70 in the rankings qualified.

Cards are retained by the top 115 or 125 (not sure which) so Bradley's withdrawal makes no difference to the standing of anyone "on the bubble" as they would not have qualified in any event for the BMW.
 
Not at this event as only the top 70 in the rankings qualified.

Cards are retained by the top 115 or 125 (not sure which) so Bradley's withdrawal makes no difference to the standing of anyone "on the bubble" as they would not have qualified in any event for the BMW.
Oh right , didnt know that , Ta
 
"However, after the round a spectator told Bradley he had seen the ball bounce before coming to rest, leaving the Ryder Cup wild card uncertain that he had handled the situation correctly"

This bit confuses me, not clear what the spectator saw or why it impacted on the situation.
 
"However, after the round a spectator told Bradley he had seen the ball bounce before coming to rest, leaving the Ryder Cup wild card uncertain that he had handled the situation correctly"

This bit confuses me, not clear what the spectator saw or why it impacted on the situation.

As I understand it after the info from the fan that the ball bounced Bradley was not 100% certain that his embedded ball was embedded in its own pitch-mark and despite the all clear from officials he withdrew
 
As I understand it after the info from the fan that the ball bounced Bradley was not 100% certain that his embedded ball was embedded in its own pitch-mark and despite the all clear from officials he withdrew

it's easy to be glib and point out that it doesn't have to be embedded at the point it first hits the ground; only that it needs to have been in the air, land, and be embedded as defined - it's also a fact that if the committee decide it's correct it is correct!

unfortunately worldwide social media activity, however right or wrong, is having an impact on how some individuals think and feel in such situations.
 
As I understand it after the info from the fan that the ball bounced Bradley was not 100% certain that his embedded ball was embedded in its own pitch-mark and despite the all clear from officials he withdrew

I suppose but wouldn't be the first time a ball has bounced and then embedded. Seems like another case of a spectator interfering. Thankfully not a 60" TV HD slow mo arm chair analysis though.
 
it's easy to be glib and point out that it doesn't have to be embedded at the point it first hits the ground; only that it needs to have been in the air, land, and be embedded as defined - it's also a fact that if the committee decide it's correct it is correct!

unfortunately worldwide social media activity, however right or wrong, is having an impact on how some individuals think and feel in such situations.

Given the poor explanation from the player himself I'm not surprised there's conjecture
 
I suppose but wouldn't be the first time a ball has bounced and then embedded. Seems like another case of a spectator interfering. Thankfully not a 60" TV HD slow mo arm chair analysis though.

I don't actually know if Bradley thought there was an issue with the embedded status of the ball or if the doubt in his mind was whether it was his balls own pitch mark or someone else's!
 
Top