percy_layer
Challenge Tour Pro
Traditionally, putting has been regarded as more of an art than science. Good putters were always highly skilled at judging pace and line.
But with new analysis techniques used by Aimpoint (green reading) as well as the work by people such as Dave Pelz and Paul Hurrion (putting stroke and practice), is good putting becoming more of a case of quantifiable deduction than 'looking and guessing'?
Curious to know what everyones thoughts are
But with new analysis techniques used by Aimpoint (green reading) as well as the work by people such as Dave Pelz and Paul Hurrion (putting stroke and practice), is good putting becoming more of a case of quantifiable deduction than 'looking and guessing'?
Curious to know what everyones thoughts are
