B
birdieman
Guest
Perusing the June edition of GM just in, on the Masters report there is a pic of Justin Rose wielding a Scotty Cameron Titleist putter at Augusta when his other clubs, bag, clothes and cap are Adidas/Taylormade. As a Taylormade sponsored guy does it not annoy Taylormade that he isn't wielding one of their Rossa putters for example? Why does sponsorship include woods, irons and hybrids but not putters? If Taylormade can't make a putter to suit one of their top pros what does that say about their woods and irons?
If he plays a titlesist putter why can't he play titleist or whatever other irons he likes as well and just wear the TM badge on his hat.
I also read that Rife putters were claiming Rose as 'one of their players' - clearly not the case recently.
As we tend to copy our heroes in what clubs we want to be seen playing (be honest, we do!) is the whole pro sponsorship thing a complete red herring designed as usual to part us from out hard-earned ££(says he currently on 2 weeks sick leave!!)?
If he plays a titlesist putter why can't he play titleist or whatever other irons he likes as well and just wear the TM badge on his hat.
I also read that Rife putters were claiming Rose as 'one of their players' - clearly not the case recently.
As we tend to copy our heroes in what clubs we want to be seen playing (be honest, we do!) is the whole pro sponsorship thing a complete red herring designed as usual to part us from out hard-earned ££(says he currently on 2 weeks sick leave!!)?
