SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
Playing with a chap on Friday he told how - the previous day in the clubs main roll-up of the week - an experienced 7 handicapper he was playing with advised him of the following.
If your ball is in a bunker and you cannot identify it - you cannot lift it to identify it. There is a new ruling that says that he must play his ball as it lies and then go and check to see if it was his ball that he had hit. If it was then he continues play. If it was not his ball then he must go back to the bunker; replace the ball as best he could to replicate the lie; and then find his own to play
My PP could not recall for certain - but he thought he was told that he would incur a penalty for playing the wrong ball out of the bunker - but wasn't sure.
Now I am 99% certain his PP was wrong in his advice - but of course there might be a new ruling that I am not aware of and his PP was correct. But assuming he was wrong - what was it that his PP was confused over that caused him to give this advice?
If your ball is in a bunker and you cannot identify it - you cannot lift it to identify it. There is a new ruling that says that he must play his ball as it lies and then go and check to see if it was his ball that he had hit. If it was then he continues play. If it was not his ball then he must go back to the bunker; replace the ball as best he could to replicate the lie; and then find his own to play
My PP could not recall for certain - but he thought he was told that he would incur a penalty for playing the wrong ball out of the bunker - but wasn't sure.
Now I am 99% certain his PP was wrong in his advice - but of course there might be a new ruling that I am not aware of and his PP was correct. But assuming he was wrong - what was it that his PP was confused over that caused him to give this advice?
Last edited: