Free relief or Not

Lucifer MorningStar

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2025
Messages
4,975
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
We had an interesting one in our Match last night and struggled for a decision.

Playing our 13th Hole the fairway cambers left to right towards the OOB and boundary fence that separates our course from the adjacent farm land. My PP Hit his tee shot up the right side and it ran down towards the OOB but we all thought it was safe as the rough stops balls rolling OOB, when we got up to the ball we were all baffled. We found the rough has all been cut down and the ball was rested up against a railway sleeper with absolutely no chance of a swing and there were sleepers running full length of the hole that have never been there before sitting on the inside of the boundary fence line but not directly against it. There’s a small gap of about 6-12” between the fence line and sleepers. It was nearer 12” sized gap from the fence where his ball was.

We checked the scorecard and there was nothing on there regarding the sleepers, none of the 4 of us in the group had ever seen them on the course before, nobody had seen signage in the locker room about it and no email correspondence about it. So it was agreed amongst the 4 of us that as they were on the inside of the boundary line with a clear gap between the fence and sleeper he could take free relief. It made no difference as we lost the hole anyway.

When we got back to the clubhouse we found out the Sleepers were installed on Monday as a way of stopping balls running OOB (odd decision as the rough always did that and they had to cut it down to put these in). Anyway we spoke to the Pro who told us it should have been a penalty drop as the sleepers now form part of the boundary fence! This caused further confusion as;

A) They’re inside the actual course boundary line in some places by a good 12”
B) There has been no correspondence with the members that they were being installed and would now form the boundary line
C) The card and local rules state any Man made object is to be allowed free relief (paraphrasing can’t remember the exact wording)
D) Our card and local rules board state the staked wire fence running along the course boundary denotes the boundary of the course and anything beyond that is OOB (again can’t remember exact wording) so in our minds this is still the actual boundary until something is released to state otherwise and thus the man made sleepers inside that line should be free relief.

Pro was still adamant it should have been a penalty drop as it’s preventing balls from going beyond the boundary, one of committee members with him agreed but the rest of us think otherwise as there has been no communication which changes what is currently written in our local rules.

So whose right 🤷🏼
 
In my opinion, if a condition arises on the course that is the result of some work being done, and a LR has not been put in place by the committee to cover the condition, or the committee have not communicated to the members the status of the condition, then players can only apply the rules of golf to the condition as they find it...and in this case, treat the sleepers as immovable obstructions and take free relief as appropriate.

If the committee had communicated the presence of the sleepers and defined them as forming part of the course boundary, then your pro and committee member are correct.

Seemingly though, you received no such communication....so I'm with you on this one.
 
If a Local Rule has not been published it cannot be a Local Rule.

Further,

8. Model Local Rules​

Local Rules that are inconsistent with these guidelines are not authorized, and a round played with such a Local Rule in place is not considered to have been played by the Rules of Golf.
 
Yep, you’re not psychic. The rules are what they say they are. If a ‘rule’ exists only inside the brain of the pro then it’s not a rule. He is just telling you what he thinks the rule SHOULD BE, (or maybe what it will be in future, when it’s published). But it’s not the rule now.
 
Yep, you’re not psychic. The rules are what they say they are. If a ‘rule’ exists only inside the brain of the pro then it’s not a rule. He is just telling you what he thinks the rule SHOULD BE, (or maybe what it will be in future, when it’s published). But it’s not the rule now.
That was my main argument, the change of LR hasn’t be published, it was only brought up as we asked the question. The Pro gave us his definition I’m assuming based on a change that will occur but as of yet it’s not been changed in our LR’s but also fact remains even then it’s inside of the actual course boundary.

I’ve emailed the committee for clarification this morning as there’s a comp at the weekend and I’d hate people to fall foul without knowing. If no comms occurs before then I will continue to play as we did as word of mouth isn’t official.
 
At the time you made it, your call was correct.

The club needs to decide exactly where they want the OOB - the Committee is responsible for marking the course accurately. The pro's opinion is simply that - an opinion - the Committee must decide what they want and make it clear to all.
 
That was my main argument, the change of LR hasn’t be published, it was only brought up as we asked the question. The Pro gave us his definition I’m assuming based on a change that will occur but as of yet it’s not been changed in our LR’s but also fact remains even then it’s inside of the actual course boundary.

I’ve emailed the committee for clarification this morning as there’s a comp at the weekend and I’d hate people to fall foul without knowing. If no comms occurs before then I will continue to play as we did as word of mouth isn’t official.
The fun scenario will be if they inform you in writing of the local rule, sending you a copy, but still neglect to publish it to everyone. What rules are you playing then? 🤣
 
How are you to know the club has placed them there and they haven’t been dumped by an unscrupulous individual.
Unless informed otherwise your course of action would be correct and how I would of interpreted it,
This is just my opinion though.
 
That was my main argument, the change of LR hasn’t be published, it was only brought up as we asked the question. The Pro gave us his definition I’m assuming based on a change that will occur but as of yet it’s not been changed in our LR’s but also fact remains even then it’s inside of the actual course boundary.

I’ve emailed the committee for clarification this morning as there’s a comp at the weekend and I’d hate people to fall foul without knowing. If no comms occurs before then I will continue to play as we did as word of mouth isn’t official.
People make the mistake all the time of assuming the club Pro knows the rules..... Just saying
 
People make the mistake all the time of assuming the club Pro knows the rules..... Just saying
Well he’s a qualified tournament rules official and officiates at county events so assuming he’d know the rule is not a leap of faith or a mistake. 🤷🏼

He’s probably right in the ruling if the club had emailed and informed the members!
 
Well he’s a qualified tournament rules official and officiates at county events so assuming he’d know the rule is not a leap of faith or a mistake. 🤷🏼

He’s probably right in the ruling if the club had emailed and informed the members!
He's a rare specimen then, I've never come across a pro that is a qualified rules official and officiates at amateur events.
 
He's a rare specimen then, I've never come across a pro that is a qualified rules official and officiates at amateur events.
He’s always at county events helping out down this way with the junior level so guess that makes him odd or just someone that likes to get involved and help the younger generation. As far as I’m aware he’s been a qualified roles guy for a number of years 🤷🏼

Back in Kent our Pro at the club I was at as a Junior did the same thing qualified roles official and club pro. His dad was also the head of the county golf rules board. So I guess I don’t see that as an anomaly as it’s essentially happened at 2 clubs I’ve been a member at.
 
That was my main argument, the change of LR hasn’t be published, it was only brought up as we asked the question. The Pro gave us his definition I’m assuming based on a change that will occur but as of yet it’s not been changed in our LR’s but also fact remains even then it’s inside of the actual course boundary.

I’ve emailed the committee for clarification this morning as there’s a comp at the weekend and I’d hate people to fall foul without knowing. If no comms occurs before then I will continue to play as we did as word of mouth isn’t official.
Did the committee respond or even acknowledge your email?
 
If a ball that lands safely in the middle of the fairway can run out of bounds, it doesn’t sound like a good hole or one that is fun to play.
I agree, no published LR, means no new LR.
 
Did the committee respond or even acknowledge your email?
Nope not had anything back from them at all, when I went to the club Monday to practice their still wasn’t any updates on the notice boards in the clubhouse nor on the rules board near our 1st tee. No club wide email correspondence informing of the change either.

Quick glance at the clubs LR page on the website and it still states:

Local Rules
Out of bounds:
Beyond all hedges or fences making the boundaries of the course, and on or beyond the bridle way to the right of the 3rd/12th tee.
The car park.

So if nothing comes through by tomorrow evening I’ll be playing the rules as they currently are stipulated will be informing my PP if it happens to anyone that we will be taking free relief from the man made object.
 
If a ball that lands safely in the middle of the fairway can run out of bounds, it doesn’t sound like a good hole or one that is fun to play.
I agree, no published LR, means no new LR.
It’s actually a really bloody good hole, really challenging as well. If you land on the right side it does slope down toward OOB but there is a little catchment ledge and also the rough is usually a good length and stops balls. It’s a hole that makes you think and genuinely a good hole it’s only usually a real slice straight right or a real dodgy and unlucky bounce clearing the small ledge, all the rough and avoiding the trees along the edge of that which would make you go OOB. HOWEVER for some mad reason they shaved all the rough down in order to put those sleepers in so now a dodgy bounce and it will roll through everything.

Absolute madness 🤯
 
So to follow on from this. I played with our pro today and on said hole pointed out the issue. He again confirmed what the rule should be as in penalty stroke due to now forming part of the boundary.

However, upon showing him how they’ve been laid, he conceded that they’ve essentially laid the sleepers incorrectly inside of the boundary fence. They were meant to butted up against the fence like kick boards on garden fences thus making them and integral part of the course. Essentially keeping the ball in bounds and penalty stroke taken to stop people having to walk back to reload, and having the gap shows them to be internally part of the course hence he was in agreement they’re not forming part of the boundary.

He also conceded that the club should have published a new LR informing everyone of the change. So as of this evening he’s feeding back they need to resite the sleepers correctly to form part of the boundary fence (base of it) and that until the LR is officially changed then we should proceed as I did in taking free relief. This weekends comp will be a mess if everyone doesn’t get the memo 😂
 
Last edited:
So to follow on from this. I played with our pro today and on said hole pointed out the issue. He again confirmed what the rule should be as in penalty stroke due to now forming part of the boundary.

However, upon showing him how they’ve been laid, he conceded that they’ve essentially laid the sleepers incorrectly inside of the boundary fence. They were meant to butted up against the fence like kick boards on garden fences thus making them and integral part of the course. Essentially keeping the ball in bounds and penalty stroke taken to stop people having to walk back to reload, and having the gap shows them to be internally part of the course hence he was in agreement they’re not forming part of the boundary.

He also conceded that the club should have published a new LR informing everyone of the change. So as of this evening he’s feeding back they need to resite the sleepers correctly to form part of the boundary fence (base of it) and that until the LR is officially changed then we should proceed as I did in taking free relief. This weekends comp will be a mess if everyone doesn’t get the memo 😂
Another fine plan botched in the delivery, chaos the result.
 
Top