Very, very trippy. Loads of cgi. Okay but not great.
As mentioned by @Springveldt there are two post film clips. In reality you can leave after the first. The second is humorous but not relevant to any storyline. You will have to take the walk of shame though
Speaking of Sandra Bullock, we watched Lost City last night, first 30 minutes were half decent, the other 90 minutes were pure tripe, awful film.
And just what has Sandra Bullock done to her face 🤮
We haven't. The trailers didn't tempt me, too dark, and once out I didn't see a decent review. I think that is the first Marvel film I've missed, wished I'd missed The Eternals as well 😆
Watched a film on Netflix called The Adam Project. Ryan Reynolds in some time-travel type shenanigans. It was alright. As with all time-travel films there were plenty of bits that don't really make sense if you think about them too much. But it had some decent action and a few comedy moments as you'd expect from Ryan Reynolds. Mark Ruffalo plays a vivacious scientist which is not exactly out of his comfort zone.
Some films should not be allowed to have sequels. Top Gun.
The original was brilliant because the US Navy let them do all the flying scenes. This one is just total CGI bollcks.
Some films should not be allowed to have sequels. Top Gun.
The original was brilliant because the US Navy let them do all the flying scenes. This one is just total CGI bollcks.
Some films should not be allowed to have sequels. Top Gun.
The original was brilliant because the US Navy let them do all the flying scenes. This one is just total CGI bollcks.
Check out the trailers. No way any fighter plane flies down a canyon like that let alone two of them abreast. Or when two planes are closer than any real plane would be and Cruise comes up the middle of them? Garbage.