anotherdouble
Journeyman Pro
Following on from London. I don't know if Red Ken or lately Boris has had any positive effect in London so will this Manchester mayor have any tangible effect to the people of Manchester.
Well, if I recall correctly, the people of Manchester voted against having an elected Mayor didn't they? So I doubt it's gonna be popular.. It doesn't need it IMO..
That was before Louis Van Gaal, he's definitely having a "mare".
I always thought that it was better when a Mayor was internally elected by the local councillors, who probably know him or her personally, rather than the general electorate. Elected Mayors are a stupid American idea! Just another gravy train for career politicians!Don't start another football thread mate... You know how they go.. The vultures will be along quicker than you on a pile of toast at Conwy..
With regards to the OP.. What's the betting that this is a calculated ploy to introduce a degree of separation between the people and the Government, just before they introduce congestion charging in Manchester?
Is it Bez?
Oy, thats racist that is!!! Mods, Mods... He's stereotyping us Northerners again...![]()
I always thought that it was better when a Mayor was internally elected by the local councillors, who probably know him or her personally, rather than the general electorate. Elected Mayors are a stupid American idea! Just another gravy train for career politicians!![]()
But earlier this year Bez announced his intention to stand as an independent candidate for some constituency in Manchester, so this would seem a logical step into local politics for the self styled freaky dancer.
And in no way was I trying to stereotype the flare wearing melon twisting miserable flat cap wearing 'grim up north' rainy northern town inhabitants at all.
Bez is a scouser, actually.
Not sure if I should have admitted that!![]()
Well he was born in Salford, lives in Manchester and supports Man U. So he's not a very good one![]()
It's so annoying hearing things like this are happening when there's massive spending cuts to local government which are having a massive impact on the areas that need it.
How can they justify the cost of having a mayor whilst there's cost cutting aots?
It's so annoying hearing things like this are happening when there's massive spending cuts to local government which are having a massive impact on the areas that need it.
How can they justify the cost of having a mayor whilst there's cost cutting aots?
May be I'm being cynical but I expect it's all playing politics and all to do with devolution and the English votes for English laws thing. As the government have promised more devolution/powers to the Scots then they also need to be seen to devolving more power out to the regions in England. So when it comes to election time they can claim that they are not so London biased to try and get some more votes elsewhere in England.