Cricket 2021

[Fade and Die]

never seen anything like it before

Neither had the umpires that’s for sure otherwise they would have just made the call. Match referee called it I reckon.

 

[Liverpoolphil]

Strange decision. Cox had the catch under control then Bell-Drummond crashed into him! Surely he was out.

Cox was in contact with Bell-Drummond who was in contact with the boundary so a 6 was the correct decision

 

[Liverpoolphil]

Shocking decision 🤬🤬🤬

 

[Fade and Die]

Cox was in contact with Bell-Drummond who was in contact with the boundary so a 6 was the correct decision

But after the catch was taken.

 

[Liverpoolphil]

Wow that’s a bit special 😲

that’s won it 😢

 

[Liverpoolphil]

But after the catch was taken.

Doesn’t matter - it’s the same as you can’t take the catch and be stood on the boundary

 

[Wilson]

Doesn’t matter - it’s the same as you can’t take the catch and be stood on the boundary

Is that the rule Phil, or an assumption based on the rule we know about treading on the boundary? I would have thought the ball was dead once the catch was taken? Bumble says it’s should be out…

Amazing fielding for the last catch!

 

[Fade and Die]

Doesn’t matter - it’s the same as you can’t take the catch and be stood on the boundary

Not convinced it is the same. Interested to hear what Bumble is going to say when there is a break in the action.

 

[Dando]

Cox was in contact with Bell-Drummond who was in contact with the boundary so a 6 was the correct decision

Somerset fan by any chance?

 

[Dando]

Doesn’t matter - it’s the same as you can’t take the catch and be stood on the boundary

The catcher wasn’t stood on the boundary

 

[Liverpoolphil]

Is that the rule Phil, or an assumption based on the rule we know about treading on the boundary? I would have thought the ball was dead once the catch was taken? Bumble says it’s should be out…

Amazing fielding for the last catch!

There is a rule about helping someone take the catch so that he could be stood on the rope lifting the player up and he catches the ball. The one issue was when the catch is “complete” -

 

[Dando]

There is a rule about helping someone take the catch so that he could be stood on the rope lifting the player up and he catches the ball. The one issue was when the catch is “complete” -

How was bell-Drummond helping him?

 

[Fade and Die]

Think Bumble just explained it well enough, the catch was taken and completed whilst the catcher was nowhere near the boundary. What the fella is doing laying on the floor is irrelevant. It’s Out!

 

[Liverpoolphil]

The catcher wasn’t stood on the boundary

But the catcher was in contact with someone stood on the boundary. But then the umpire did get LBW to a ball missing by a significant amount

 

[Fade and Die]

There is a rule about helping someone take the catch so that he could be stood on the rope lifting the player up and he catches the ball. The one issue was when the catch is “complete” -

Nas said it has to be intentional help. Do you think Bell Drummond was intentionally helping? Do you think he helped at all?

 

[Dando]

But the catcher was in contact with someone stood on the boundary. But then the umpire did get LBW to a ball missing by a significant amount

He wasn’t stood on the boundary

 

[Liverpoolphil]

He wasn’t stood on the boundary

Bell Drummond was and Cox was in contact with him 🤷‍♂️

Was it as shocking as the LBW against Lammonby

 

[Dando]

Bell Drummond was and Cox was in contact with him 🤷‍♂️

Was it as shocking as the LBW against Lammonby

Bell Drummond was on his arse looking the other way - there was NO intent to help

 

[Liverpoolphil]

Bell Drummond was on his arse looking the other way - there was NO intent to help

The umpires with the help of the third umpire made the call and even now people are split about it

 

[Fade and Die]

Bell Drummond was and Cox was in contact with him 🤷‍♂️

Was it as shocking as the LBW against Lammonby

Do two wrongs make a right then? Just two bits of poor umpiring I think.