Are driver shafts too long?

virtuocity

Tour Winner
Joined
May 13, 2011
Messages
4,952
Location
Ayrshire
Visit site
At 46 inches, are they setting up us hackers to miss the effective sweet spot more often than not? Do they only serve their own distance-enhancing marketing?

Is it time to downsize?
 
I am one for keeping the drivershaft the right length for the person. At one time it made a big difference to me, with my improved swing and new driver it probably wouldn't as I am happy with my good swing dispersion.

For some 46 is fine and causes no issues, for others its the cause of the problems, another group just blame it for their swing faults when it would make no difference either way!

Only way to find out is to either grip down for a few rounds and see if it makes a difference (cutting a shaft just makes that more comfortable right?) or go ahead and make the reduction.

Don't endlessly blame the length if you have yet to try gripping down on it for a few rounds...
 
I have tried going down the shaft on a driver but it was not comfortable so it did not work as an experiment. I understand the physics of lengthening shafts but for many, shorties like myself included, it is a problem rather than a benefit. Maybe we will start to see an expansion of the mini driver option or 3 woods will develop bigger heads? Unfortunately the obsession with driver distance is taking over everything else, control, forgiveness, so lengthening the shaft is a logical next step as they run out of other ways to add that magical extra 10yds.
 
At 46 inches, are they setting up us hackers to miss the effective sweet spot more often than not? Do they only serve their own distance-enhancing marketing?

Is it time to downsize?

Very few if any drivers come with a 46in shaft as standard.

But in general, yes driver shafts are too long. 44.5 to 45 max would be a step in the right direction but the robots wouldn't hit them as far.
 
Last edited:
TM shafts are.

Ping appear to be 'normal' and you can feel the shorter shaft promoting a feeling of more control.

I remember noting how some Driver shafts on tour looked very short, but when you swing at 120mph theres no real loss in distance and certainly more control.
 
TM shafts are.

Ping appear to be 'normal' and you can feel the shorter shaft promoting a feeling of more control.

I remember noting how some Driver shafts on tour looked very short, but when you swing at 120mph theres no real loss in distance and certainly more control.

Ping G25/30 shafts come in at 45.75, some of the longest on the market and longer than the 45.5 of the SLDR and the R15. The standard Aero Burner is 45.75, the same length as the Ping G series.
 
I got fitted for 44" shaft, I feel more in control, accuracy has improved and no loss of distance. In fact I feel I can be more aggressive with it. So answer is, Yes.
 
Can you buy a 44.5 shaft off the shelf?
Or would this have to be fitted?

Think you'd have to be fitted tbh.

Feels weird using my new Titleist 910, feels really short. Don't think there's much of a difference between it and my X Hot, but the X Hot feels so much longer. I imagine, once I get it regripped I'll feel much more in control than I do with my X Hot!
 
I would say they are too long and to make matters worse drivers aimed at "Better Players" seem to have shorter shafts than those aimed at players looking for more forgiveness.

I've never understood that one?
 
I'd say most amateurs should sacrifice a bit of distance to get hit the fairway more often with their driver, so a shorter shaft seems sensible. But as there is such a culture of 'distance is king' in golf then it is very difficult for someone to be honest and actually do that.

I know Crossfield has expressed this a bit when testing drivers saying he fears the stock shaft is too long for a lot of amateurs on a few of them. I've always though that for the vast majority of amateurs having driver shafts at different lengths when getting fitted is probably better than choosing from different brands of shafts. But what do I know.
 
Most people wouldn't lose any distance from a shorter driver though, they'd gain it. The shorter driver should lead to more consistent strike, which would result in better consistent distance. Effective strike > Slightly faster clubhead speed.
 
Ping G25/30 shafts come in at 45.75, some of the longest on the market and longer than the 45.5 of the SLDR and the R15. The standard Aero Burner is 45.75, the same length as the Ping G series.

didnt know that but I've never looked at Pings G series, aimed at the higher h/cap yet longer and less controllable shafts.
 
I cut the shaft down on my Cobra Amp Cell to 44.25 and it has been a great help, hitting the ball much better with it than I had before. I never accurately measured distance before the change, so I can't say if it's worsened or improved overall distance, but I get more consistent strikes with it being shorter and that's helped me hit more fairways which is what I was looking for.

A couple of weeks ago, my father-in-law was visiting and he had my Taylor Made Burner Superfast that's in my old bag at the range. I think it's stock 45.75" and I had a quick go with it again after not touching it for a couple of years. I found it completely unplayable after becoming used to the shorter Cobra. I could probably get used to it again but I think it would put me back into a lot of trouble.
 
didnt know that but I've never looked at Pings G series, aimed at the higher h/cap yet longer and less controllable shafts.

Like Bubba? :D

The i25 is 45.25 as standard, 0.25 longer than the Titleist 913/915 and 0.25in shorter than TM R15 and 0.5in shorter than its G series cousins.

The only 46in as standard driver I know of is the new Callaway XR. Not sure how a 46in shaft weighing only 50g is going to help anyone find the sweet spot more consistently. :confused:
 
The shafts are getting longer and I've noticed that instead of changing this more and more Mini Driver woods are appearing instead
 
Top