Anyone ever had their mind changed?

Has your opinion changed?

  • Yes, I listened and agreed that I was wrong.

    Votes: 9 90.0%
  • No, don't be daft. I'm a golfing God and the fount of all knowledge.

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .

bluewolf

Money List Winner
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
9,557
Location
St. Andish
Visit site
Seems to have been quite a lot of discussion recently regarding lots of different things. Plenty of pages of people arguing back and forth..

So, in all seriousness ;) Has anyone ever had their opinion changed during a forum discussion (handbag argument)?
 
Yes many a time , sometimes you only see one view , your view , and later you may see a different view as you read what others have to say and see more information on the said subject , I like to keep an open mind on most things ..............EYG
 
Bollocks - I said yes and now I want to change my mind :one:
 
Well, I have taken on board some of the points raised during recent retirement thread and will be changing some of the original thoughts/plans I had for my imminent[ish] retirement... Does that count?
 
Well, I have taken on board some of the points raised during recent retirement thread and will be changing some of the original thoughts/plans I had for my imminent[ish] retirement... Does that count?

NO. ;)
Anyway, I answered No. I'm too smart to have my well thought out opinions altered on an internet forum..:D
 
Well, I have taken on board some of the points raised during recent retirement thread and will be changing some of the original thoughts/plans I had for my imminent[ish] retirement... Does that count?

Very good , There is positive in everything , you have to decide which is and use it ...............EYG
 
Frequently and then back again quite quickly! The Dyson thread is typical as I read it and think "I agree" and then read another post and think "I agree" and then think "oh, those two are disagreeing so what do I agree with?"!!
 
Frequently and then back again quite quickly! The Dyson thread is typical as I read it and think "I agree" and then read another post and think "I agree" and then think "oh, those two are disagreeing so what do I agree with?"!!

See! Thats why I never change my mind.. It would just get too confusing. Brutal stubbornness is like Chicken soup for the soul...
 
Potentially on here; not really thought about it. Would guess so with the amount of discussions we have - and the strong (and often persuasive) arguments put forward on almost everything ...

Had my entire mind and views changed with regards the student loans tuition increase when writing a paper on the subject for uni. Put simply, I was adamantly against any rises in fees which I already thought were too high. I then read the Browne review as part of my research and the logical and factual information changed my opinion to thinking that the increase to £9000 could be justified, especially with the reduction in the amounts and percentages paid back. However, I maintained (and still do) two things; 1) that any rise should have been only been made if essential 2) that some degrees are worth more than others. I could quite easily see the reasoning behind a rise in fees for studying Medicine at Cambridge, however, didn't think this same rise (from £3k to £9k) should have been applied to all degrees such as the 'david beckham studies' course you could do at Staffordshire. On average, somebody with a Cambridge medicine degree is likely to reap a much higher return for their investment compared with the other one and the costs for the course are also likely to be higher. Just my opinion.
 
Muligatawny is better for the soul -did that work?

Mulligatawny doesn't work for the soul mate.. It's too spicy. Good for the intestines though.. I would have thought that you of all people would understand that Chicken Soup is best, considering that your GC doesn't serve bacon..;)
 
Mulligatawny doesn't work for the soul mate.. It's too spicy. Good for the intestines though.. I would have thought that you of all people would understand that Chicken Soup is best, considering that your GC doesn't serve bacon..;)
Ok, chicken soup wrapped in Bacon, sounds nice. To answer the question, I probably have. I have altered the strength of my opinion loads of times though, as I think many others have.
 
Seems to have been quite a lot of discussion recently regarding lots of different things. Plenty of pages of people arguing back and forth..

So, in all seriousness ;) Has anyone ever had their opinion changed during a forum discussion (handbag argument)?

Yes - on DMDs. I was a total anti but recognise now that it is just common sense to make use of one when playing a course you have never seen before when you want to score well.
 
Potentially on here; not really thought about it. Would guess so with the amount of discussions we have - and the strong (and often persuasive) arguments put forward on almost everything ...

Had my entire mind and views changed with regards the student loans tuition increase when writing a paper on the subject for uni. Put simply, I was adamantly against any rises in fees which I already thought were too high. I then read the Browne review as part of my research and the logical and factual information changed my opinion to thinking that the increase to £9000 could be justified, especially with the reduction in the amounts and percentages paid back. However, I maintained (and still do) two things; 1) that any rise should have been only been made if essential 2) that some degrees are worth more than others. I could quite easily see the reasoning behind a rise in fees for studying Medicine at Cambridge, however, didn't think this same rise (from £3k to £9k) should have been applied to all degrees such as the 'david beckham studies' course you could do at Staffordshire. On average, somebody with a Cambridge medicine degree is likely to reap a much higher return for their investment compared with the other one and the costs for the course are also likely to be higher. Just my opinion.

Tuition fees was something I instinctively railed against as being highly discriminatory against the poorer - until I thought it through and considered the 'loans' students get in a different way - considering them as simply a higher education tax that kicks in at a salary threshold. So when the graduate's gross crosses the threshold - the take-home goes up by less than it otherwise would have. Put this way it sounds to me quite reasonable and actually completely painless to the graduate - as opposed to the graduate having a 'loan' to be paid back in X yrs hanging over them - it just isn't like that.
 
Top