woody69
Journeyman Pro
Rather foolishly received a 2 stroke penalty on our 18th today, whilst knocking a 50ft putt up towards the hole, I slightly mis-hit it and ended up striking a FCs ball that wasn't on the correct line, but was near the hole. I know I should have asked him to mark it, but it did get me wondering as to why such a rule exists.
If I am off the green and strike a ball that is on the green then he just replaces his close to the original spot as possible and I play mine where it lies with no penalty, so if it deflects off the ball at rest and goes in the hole, then great! I appreciate if I am on the green and deliberately aim my putt so my ball deflects off a ball at rest and goes in the hole then that would be a unfair, but couldn't the ruling be that when both balls are on the green then both balls must just be replaced and replayed from the original spot without penalty? What would be an argument against that? Even a 1 stroke penalty would be better. Just felt like a 2 stroke penalty was overly draconian so wondered what the argument is for it being so harsh especially in matchplay there is no penalty at all.
If I am off the green and strike a ball that is on the green then he just replaces his close to the original spot as possible and I play mine where it lies with no penalty, so if it deflects off the ball at rest and goes in the hole, then great! I appreciate if I am on the green and deliberately aim my putt so my ball deflects off a ball at rest and goes in the hole then that would be a unfair, but couldn't the ruling be that when both balls are on the green then both balls must just be replaced and replayed from the original spot without penalty? What would be an argument against that? Even a 1 stroke penalty would be better. Just felt like a 2 stroke penalty was overly draconian so wondered what the argument is for it being so harsh especially in matchplay there is no penalty at all.