I would like looking at the greats.Ben Hogan DTL is the perfect example of same address plane as impact. Again, it seems to have worked well for me. Others , maybe not there thing.But I’m glad i can keep my mind uncluttered
Doesn’t the design of the club already suggest how to get it from point a to b? If I return the club to its address position. And have the sole laying flat at impact and beyond. Wouldn’t that be an adequate swing path and direction ? I used to think like your post.And by simplifying how I see...
I know:: I so know.Have to step away from all the so called scholars and experts.Look at the implement, and figure out how to move it on your own.Until then… you are lost in the woods my friend.Lost… lost .. lost
Both.in reality there should be no difference in a 1 inch putt and a 250 yard drive.It’s an implement in your hand.Your body knows what to do if you let it.Use Inertia and gravity
I’ve studied a lot of it.But seems like most is just overkill.Or maybe they want to think they are the smart guy in the room.This game isn’t that bad once you just think of why the clubs were designed to do the task.I’m positive handicaps would plummet if they kept it simple as that.But no …...
It’s so simple really.One would use Inertia; centrifugal and centripetal forces.
Can figure all this out with no prior golf instruction.If you need speed
Any joe on the street can get that in 20 mins
Develop your own natural swing around how the club was designed.As simple as one can make it
If I handed anyone a random person a wedge.And ask them what would it take to use this correctly.They would see by design how it needs to be done. Very simple
Agree.. but for a DYI golfer.I see no reason why they can’t develop a swing by just looking at how the club is designed.Many are making this way more complicated that it should be.Not everyone will have a picturesque motion.But you can have a motion that utilizes club design.With no formal...