It's the length of the tee which has a limit, not the height the ball is above the ground.
And we don't need another discussion about "length" (of scorecards). :)
Look at the descent angles in the Ping chart and Nick's descent angles are right in the range for his swing speed with those clubs. Increasing the swing speed would be required to get into the 40's, and that's a difficult proposition (my data would be similar to Nick's). It's depressing to try...
Seems a lot of reference to 3-putting. That's usually result of poor distance control or missing short putts. I'm more interested in the total number of putts I used during the round. Anything 31 or less is usually a good score. 3-putts are irritants but can be resolved by making short putts.
People make choices based on the best information they have available at the time. If one makes such a choice for A rather than B, one should not expect compensation from A for that choice.
TMI. (too much information). Just choose the club and hit the required shot. "Gapping" is, imo, significantly over-rated. A player should be able to hit at least three clubs proficiently to a 100 yard marker.
Interesting that 5 of those 6 changes are the result of the R&A and USGA recently (January 1, 2026) announced changes/additions to authorized Model Local Rules. The other one is limiting the "relief" distance for lift, clean and place to one scorecard length from one club-length.