Recent content by Mozza14

Catching up with these proposals. I welcome both as they appear to positively improve competition play. Cr -Par will make for a more satisfying outcome for golfers at our course where the white tee course rating exceeds the par. This will have a welcome feel good factor in getting scores into...

Really ? An email with what you have just written?

Our Club has taken my examples forward with whs support but not heard back yet. I was trying to avoid the trawl through and wondered if there was an easy way to do a compare and throw out a report of missing scores.

Some of my friends examples were exactly like that. They had partial (less than 20 records) further reduced by missing scores. Certainly a material impact on them and not helping the credibility of the new system.

I take your point and it will depend on the extent of the numbers involved. The small sample I have done indicates we have an issue and I was trying to find out if there was an easy way to check. Not being an administrator, I was asking the experts if they could easily retrieve the relevant...

I think it's a widespread issue. With EG putting a disclaimer notice on our records, saying it is up to the Clubs, I want to know if anything will be done and if so, what is the easiest way for Clubs to check and resolve omissions.

Thanks. I guess those examples will be typical of why they were not picked up. Did the Member highlight their omission or did you find them and how? I have examined around half a dozen friends scores and found up to four missing scores from each of their records. If we have 450 members what is...

What are Clubs doing about missing scores from player's records not picked up during the transition? I and several friends are still missing scores following the transition process. From this small sample, it would therefore appear to be the tip of the iceberg. Is there a way for...

Yes, I think WHS tracks performance and reflects this in the Handicap Index well. I calculate your Index at 3.8 following the last round shown. All I am saying is that the table would be so much better if that 3.8 was shown against the last differential (one of your best 8). I can see we have...

I can see that entirely. WHS is clearly better for tracking all performance. You have, however, changed the topic there. We were discussing why you felt showing an adjustment to your handicap against the date and score that produced it, was confusing?

May I ask what you found confusing? The results page in HDID showed score less handicap (rounded) = Net Score. It then also showed the resulting Handicap to one decimal point. I found that informative. The handicap record page showed for each date : CSS, Differential = Score -CSS- handicap...

I think you are really describing the production of 'results'. The WHS Portal is there to store fixed data, such as Course Rating and Slope (both per tee) and then to apply variable data, the adjusted score and the PCC in order to create a differential for each round. The end game is the...

The correlation between the two lines on the graph is far stronger by matching the last differential against the HI it produced. Any HI on the graph is derived from the best 8 scores from 20 (for a full history) To show a top 8 differential and mark it, but not show how it moved the HI is not...

I agree with that. Take my own example. My Current HI is 6.2 which is 0.8 above the last HI of 5.4 shown on my graph. So my HI is trending rapidly upwards but looking at the graph it is not as apparent as it should be. Why exclude the most relevant figure? I have no problem with WHS. I think it...

Think you meant Course Rating. The course handicap is not relevant to the updated HI.