It's been said many times before but the ball "rollback" won't impact most golfers as most existing balls are already compliant with the proposed changes anyway.
It's just the top end balls like the ProV1 etc that would need tweaking, and only to a small degree that wouldn't effect most golfers...
This is the key advantage of having lots of sets of clubs, I know I'll be changing out the whole bag the next week so I can just blame that week's clubs and look forward to the next week and a different set.
It even works the other way, if I'm playing well I know that I'll be swapping...
There were a few companies offering similar in the 70s or 80s, maybe even 90s.
A trolley where the clubs are positioned heads down, usually has a seat as well and some pockets.
They look funky but take up a lot more space than a normal bag and trolley and unless you put the clubs in the correct...
The looks of a club are the most important element for me, they must be beautiful, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
At the same time I'm also attracted to clubs at the opposite end of the spectrum. I love taking out a set of ugly ducklings, the stranger the better.
If you believe that changing shafts will make a great difference to your swing then I agree that there is no alternative to trying them out for yourself and checking results.
I recently did a VERY scientific study on how shaft flexes have "evolved", which also shows the variation to be found...
Many years ago there was a push for professionals to play with less clubs, a competition was even held with a reduced number of clubs.
Some really liked it, but they were different days and professionalism wasn't as dominant as it is now.
And I can imagine the manufacturers making a huge fuss...
I don't see a "too many bags" problem here, rather a "not enough clubs" issue.
I have an embarrassing number of bags and they're all stuffed to the gunwales with clubs.
To add to the embarrassment, there are still a "significant number" of clubs not in bags.